"I've begun to think that [public performance of poetry] forges an unnaturally close relationship between you and the work," he says. "It is important that the work leaves the house and makes its way in the world. But when you read this stuff you have to take responsibility for it in a way that you don't want. The work isn't you. It's supposed to proceed from a more generous instinct than that."He being Don Paterson in a recent Guardian feature. And so proceeds blogging on poetry too. Mark Thwaite uses the same quotation introducing the Birmingham poet Roy Fisher to a larger audience during his weeklong residence on the Journal of the Poetry Foundation. See also the following day's discussion of the poetry of Tomas Tranströmer in light of Richard Dawkins' latest wrongheadedness.
Britain's first book blogger (November 2000)
Thursday, November 30, 2006
A generous instinct
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blogroll, etc.
Blogroll continued
- Flowerville
- Cannon Magazine
- Wittgenstein Jr
- Danny Byrne
- Marooned Off Vesta
- In lieu of a field guide
- Just William's Luck
- Vertigo (WG Sebald blog)
- Tales from the Reading Room
- The Goalie's Anxiety
- Infinite Patience
- Pechorin's Journal
- Time's Flow Stemmed
- 50 Watts
- The Philosophical Worldview Artist
- Known Unknowns
- The Age of Uncertainty
- Being in Lieu
- ads without products
- Rejectamentalist Manifesto
- TLS editors' blog
- Braingrass
- Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews
- The Bibliophilic Blogger
- Nomadics
- Life Unfurnished
Favoured author sites
Political
Blog Archive
- April 2013 (1)
- March 2013 (2)
- February 2013 (1)
- January 2013 (1)
- November 2012 (2)
- August 2012 (1)
- July 2012 (1)
- June 2012 (1)
- May 2012 (3)
- March 2012 (3)
- February 2012 (1)
- January 2012 (1)
- November 2011 (1)
- October 2011 (2)
- September 2011 (2)
- July 2011 (3)
- June 2011 (1)
- May 2011 (3)
- April 2011 (5)
- March 2011 (3)
- February 2011 (1)
- January 2011 (2)
- December 2010 (7)
- November 2010 (1)
- October 2010 (5)
- September 2010 (2)
- August 2010 (3)
- July 2010 (4)
- June 2010 (2)
- May 2010 (3)
- April 2010 (4)
- March 2010 (11)
- February 2010 (3)
- December 2009 (3)
- November 2009 (5)
- October 2009 (5)
- September 2009 (3)
- August 2009 (6)
- July 2009 (6)
- June 2009 (4)
- May 2009 (8)
- April 2009 (8)
- March 2009 (12)
- February 2009 (11)
- January 2009 (7)
- December 2008 (7)
- November 2008 (7)
- October 2008 (17)
- September 2008 (7)
- August 2008 (8)
- July 2008 (7)
- June 2008 (7)
- May 2008 (7)
- April 2008 (5)
- March 2008 (8)
- February 2008 (2)
- January 2008 (10)
- December 2007 (26)
- November 2007 (28)
- October 2007 (16)
- September 2007 (24)
- August 2007 (15)
- July 2007 (17)
- June 2007 (11)
- May 2007 (23)
- April 2007 (11)
- March 2007 (24)
- February 2007 (27)
- January 2007 (21)
- December 2006 (9)
- November 2006 (23)
- October 2006 (21)
- September 2006 (19)
- August 2006 (15)
- July 2006 (33)
- June 2006 (17)
- May 2006 (24)
- April 2006 (17)
- March 2006 (18)
- February 2006 (15)
- January 2006 (8)
- December 2005 (8)
- November 2005 (10)
- October 2005 (7)
- September 2005 (14)
- August 2005 (14)
- July 2005 (8)
- June 2005 (15)
- May 2005 (11)
- April 2005 (12)
- March 2005 (9)
- February 2005 (7)
- January 2005 (15)
- December 2004 (2)
- November 2004 (4)
- October 2004 (6)
- September 2004 (2)
Contact steve dot mitchelmore at gmail.com. Powered by Blogger.
forges an unnaturally close relationship between you and the work
ReplyDeletemmmh, sure make me think that's why I don't like reading my own work, but what would naturally close be?
religion is suggested, and then... poetry as the secular religion without the religious piety and cant, just the rites and performances...
I think its called sport.
Hi Steve. I've long appreciated your uncompromising stance towards literature and those forms of writing which attempt to pass for literature. But I have to say that in quoting without comment a poet whose work reads like a versified Nick Hornby you're giving undue heed to someone whose voice is already bruited too widely. Paterson is an aesthetically ultra-conservative mandarin whose fear of those whom he broadly tars with the epithet 'postmoderns' is only a problem for the rest of us because of his position as editor of one of the biggest poetry lists in Britain. Turning the volume down on his pronouncements would be a considerable act of justice towards those forms of poetry which are not born of a desire to please the 'average' broadsheet reader. Anyway keep up the good work.
ReplyDeleteWell I didn't expect the Spanish Inquisition!
ReplyDeleteI've not read anything by Paterson but his comments seem worth repeating when most broadsheet coverage is Plath v Hughes or Roger McGough v "the purists".
So whose voices does the volume need turning up on?
Hi Steve, hi "anonymous",
ReplyDeleteSteve -- thanks for the link to my residence at the Poetry Foundation.
Paterson is the poetry editor for Picador (they are a decent publisher, but their poetry list is pretty small these days) and he certainly does seem to be very conservative. His Picador list is very dull, too, but I quoted him -- like I'm sure you did Steve -- because the relationship and tensions between a writer and their work is a fascinating subject. And I think he most certainly does have a point here with regard to poetry and performance.
Hi Steve, Mark
ReplyDeleteApologies if I seemed bombastic in my last comment, no offense was meant to either of you, and of course you're perfectly entitled to reproduce a quote you deem to have some value. Mark, you're right that the Picador list is small, I should have clarified that by 'one of the biggest' I meant one whose publications enjoy more than their fair share of reviews, publicity etc when contrasted with the output of more adventurous houses, and that this is thanks to a populist, lowest-common-denominator philosophy and the backing of a large firm like Macmillan.
If you're interested, btw, I highly recommend www.archiveofthenow.com - a collection of readings by a diverse range of the best poets writing in our isles.
Sorry for banging on so.